2019-09-20 16:20:48 +02:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* block_copy API
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2013 Proxmox Server Solutions
|
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2019 Virtuozzo International GmbH.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Authors:
|
|
|
|
|
* Dietmar Maurer (dietmar@proxmox.com)
|
|
|
|
|
* Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later.
|
|
|
|
|
* See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef BLOCK_COPY_H
|
|
|
|
|
#define BLOCK_COPY_H
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "block/block.h"
|
2019-10-22 13:18:04 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "qemu/co-shared-resource.h"
|
2019-09-20 16:20:48 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef void (*ProgressBytesCallbackFunc)(int64_t bytes, void *opaque);
|
2020-03-11 11:30:04 +01:00
|
|
|
typedef struct BlockCopyState BlockCopyState;
|
2019-09-20 16:20:48 +02:00
|
|
|
|
block/backup: use backup-top instead of write notifiers
Drop write notifiers and use filter node instead.
= Changes =
1. Add filter-node-name argument for backup qmp api. We have to do it
in this commit, as 257 needs to be fixed.
2. There are no more write notifiers here, so is_write_notifier
parameter is dropped from block-copy paths.
3. To sync with in-flight requests at job finish we now have drained
removing of the filter, we don't need rw-lock.
4. Block-copy is now using BdrvChildren instead of BlockBackends
5. As backup-top owns these children, we also move block-copy state
into backup-top's ownership.
= Iotest changes =
56: op-blocker doesn't shoot now, as we set it on source, but then
check on filter, when trying to start second backup.
To keep the test we instead can catch another collision: both jobs will
get 'drive0' job-id, as job-id parameter is unspecified. To prevent
interleaving with file-posix locks (as they are dependent on config)
let's use another target for second backup.
Also, it's obvious now that we'd like to drop this op-blocker at all
and add a test-case for two backups from one node (to different
destinations) actually works. But not in these series.
141: Output changed: prepatch, "Node is in use" comes from bdrv_has_blk
check inside qmp_blockdev_del. But we've dropped block-copy blk
objects, so no more blk objects on source bs (job blk is on backup-top
filter bs). New message is from op-blocker, which is the next check in
qmp_blockdev_add.
257: The test wants to emulate guest write during backup. They should
go to filter node, not to original source node, of course. Therefore we
need to specify filter node name and use it.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-id: 20191001131409.14202-6-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
2019-10-01 15:14:09 +02:00
|
|
|
BlockCopyState *block_copy_state_new(BdrvChild *source, BdrvChild *target,
|
2019-10-01 15:14:07 +02:00
|
|
|
int64_t cluster_size,
|
|
|
|
|
BdrvRequestFlags write_flags,
|
|
|
|
|
Error **errp);
|
|
|
|
|
|
block/block-copy: fix progress calculation
Assume we have two regions, A and B, and region B is in-flight now,
region A is not yet touched, but it is unallocated and should be
skipped.
Correspondingly, as progress we have
total = A + B
current = 0
If we reset unallocated region A and call progress_reset_callback,
it will calculate 0 bytes dirty in the bitmap and call
job_progress_set_remaining, which will set
total = current + 0 = 0 + 0 = 0
So, B bytes are actually removed from total accounting. When job
finishes we'll have
total = 0
current = B
, which doesn't sound good.
This is because we didn't considered in-flight bytes, actually when
calculating remaining, we should have set (in_flight + dirty_bytes)
as remaining, not only dirty_bytes.
To fix it, let's refactor progress calculation, moving it to block-copy
itself instead of fixing callback. And, of course, track in_flight
bytes count.
We still have to keep one callback, to maintain backup job bytes_read
calculation, but it will go on soon, when we turn the whole backup
process into one block_copy call.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20200311103004.7649-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
2020-03-11 11:29:57 +01:00
|
|
|
void block_copy_set_progress_callback(
|
2019-10-01 15:14:07 +02:00
|
|
|
BlockCopyState *s,
|
2019-09-20 16:20:48 +02:00
|
|
|
ProgressBytesCallbackFunc progress_bytes_callback,
|
2019-10-01 15:14:07 +02:00
|
|
|
void *progress_opaque);
|
2019-09-20 16:20:48 +02:00
|
|
|
|
block/block-copy: fix progress calculation
Assume we have two regions, A and B, and region B is in-flight now,
region A is not yet touched, but it is unallocated and should be
skipped.
Correspondingly, as progress we have
total = A + B
current = 0
If we reset unallocated region A and call progress_reset_callback,
it will calculate 0 bytes dirty in the bitmap and call
job_progress_set_remaining, which will set
total = current + 0 = 0 + 0 = 0
So, B bytes are actually removed from total accounting. When job
finishes we'll have
total = 0
current = B
, which doesn't sound good.
This is because we didn't considered in-flight bytes, actually when
calculating remaining, we should have set (in_flight + dirty_bytes)
as remaining, not only dirty_bytes.
To fix it, let's refactor progress calculation, moving it to block-copy
itself instead of fixing callback. And, of course, track in_flight
bytes count.
We still have to keep one callback, to maintain backup job bytes_read
calculation, but it will go on soon, when we turn the whole backup
process into one block_copy call.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20200311103004.7649-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
2020-03-11 11:29:57 +01:00
|
|
|
void block_copy_set_progress_meter(BlockCopyState *s, ProgressMeter *pm);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-20 16:20:48 +02:00
|
|
|
void block_copy_state_free(BlockCopyState *s);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int64_t block_copy_reset_unallocated(BlockCopyState *s,
|
|
|
|
|
int64_t offset, int64_t *count);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-11 11:30:02 +01:00
|
|
|
int coroutine_fn block_copy(BlockCopyState *s, int64_t offset, int64_t bytes,
|
block/backup: use backup-top instead of write notifiers
Drop write notifiers and use filter node instead.
= Changes =
1. Add filter-node-name argument for backup qmp api. We have to do it
in this commit, as 257 needs to be fixed.
2. There are no more write notifiers here, so is_write_notifier
parameter is dropped from block-copy paths.
3. To sync with in-flight requests at job finish we now have drained
removing of the filter, we don't need rw-lock.
4. Block-copy is now using BdrvChildren instead of BlockBackends
5. As backup-top owns these children, we also move block-copy state
into backup-top's ownership.
= Iotest changes =
56: op-blocker doesn't shoot now, as we set it on source, but then
check on filter, when trying to start second backup.
To keep the test we instead can catch another collision: both jobs will
get 'drive0' job-id, as job-id parameter is unspecified. To prevent
interleaving with file-posix locks (as they are dependent on config)
let's use another target for second backup.
Also, it's obvious now that we'd like to drop this op-blocker at all
and add a test-case for two backups from one node (to different
destinations) actually works. But not in these series.
141: Output changed: prepatch, "Node is in use" comes from bdrv_has_blk
check inside qmp_blockdev_del. But we've dropped block-copy blk
objects, so no more blk objects on source bs (job blk is on backup-top
filter bs). New message is from op-blocker, which is the next check in
qmp_blockdev_add.
257: The test wants to emulate guest write during backup. They should
go to filter node, not to original source node, of course. Therefore we
need to specify filter node name and use it.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-id: 20191001131409.14202-6-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
2019-10-01 15:14:09 +02:00
|
|
|
bool *error_is_read);
|
2019-09-20 16:20:48 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-11 11:30:04 +01:00
|
|
|
BdrvDirtyBitmap *block_copy_dirty_bitmap(BlockCopyState *s);
|
|
|
|
|
void block_copy_set_skip_unallocated(BlockCopyState *s, bool skip);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-20 16:20:48 +02:00
|
|
|
#endif /* BLOCK_COPY_H */
|