diff --git a/hw/sun4m.c b/hw/sun4m.c index 7ba0f763bc..e4ca8f3dc5 100644 --- a/hw/sun4m.c +++ b/hw/sun4m.c @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ #define ESCC_CLOCK 4915200 struct sun4m_hwdef { - target_phys_addr_t iommu_base, slavio_base; + target_phys_addr_t iommu_base, iommu_pad_base, iommu_pad_len, slavio_base; target_phys_addr_t intctl_base, counter_base, nvram_base, ms_kb_base; target_phys_addr_t serial_base, fd_base; target_phys_addr_t afx_base, idreg_base, dma_base, esp_base, le_base; @@ -854,6 +854,14 @@ static void sun4m_hw_init(const struct sun4m_hwdef *hwdef, ram_addr_t RAM_size, iommu = iommu_init(hwdef->iommu_base, hwdef->iommu_version, slavio_irq[30]); + if (hwdef->iommu_pad_base) { + /* On the real hardware (SS-5, LX) the MMU is not padded, but aliased. + Software shouldn't use aliased addresses, neither should it crash + when does. Using empty_slot instead of aliasing can help with + debugging such accesses */ + empty_slot_init(hwdef->iommu_pad_base,hwdef->iommu_pad_len); + } + espdma = sparc32_dma_init(hwdef->dma_base, slavio_irq[18], iommu, &espdma_irq); @@ -965,6 +973,8 @@ static const struct sun4m_hwdef sun4m_hwdefs[] = { /* SS-5 */ { .iommu_base = 0x10000000, + .iommu_pad_base = 0x10004000, + .iommu_pad_len = 0x0fffb000, .tcx_base = 0x50000000, .cs_base = 0x6c000000, .slavio_base = 0x70000000, @@ -1091,6 +1101,8 @@ static const struct sun4m_hwdef sun4m_hwdefs[] = { /* LX */ { .iommu_base = 0x10000000, + .iommu_pad_base = 0x10004000, + .iommu_pad_len = 0x0fffb000, .tcx_base = 0x50000000, .slavio_base = 0x70000000, .ms_kb_base = 0x71000000,