From 5c9f43363a84fa13861ebc949ea2453cf7ab4ae3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Crosthwaite Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 16:38:03 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] intc/xilinx_intc: Use qemu_set_irq Use qemu_set_irq rather than if-elsing qemu_irq_(lower|raise). No functional change, just reduces verbosity. Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev --- hw/intc/xilinx_intc.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/intc/xilinx_intc.c b/hw/intc/xilinx_intc.c index b106e724ab..5df7008e2f 100644 --- a/hw/intc/xilinx_intc.c +++ b/hw/intc/xilinx_intc.c @@ -66,11 +66,7 @@ static void update_irq(struct xlx_pic *p) i = ~0; p->regs[R_IVR] = i; - if ((p->regs[R_MER] & 1) && p->regs[R_IPR]) { - qemu_irq_raise(p->parent_irq); - } else { - qemu_irq_lower(p->parent_irq); - } + qemu_set_irq(p->parent_irq, (p->regs[R_MER] & 1) && p->regs[R_IPR]); } static uint64_t