memory-device: Support big alignment requirements

Let's warn instead of bailing out - the worst thing that can happen is
that we'll fail hot/coldplug later. The user got warned, and this should
be rare.

This will be necessary for memory devices with rather big (user-defined)
alignment requirements - say a virtio-mem device with a 2G block size -
which will become important, for example, when supporting vfio in the
future.

Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201008083029.9504-5-david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
David Hildenbrand 2020-10-08 10:30:27 +02:00 committed by Michael S. Tsirkin
parent 228957fea3
commit 780a4d24e7

View file

@ -119,9 +119,10 @@ static uint64_t memory_device_get_free_addr(MachineState *ms,
/* start of address space indicates the maximum alignment we expect */
if (!QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(range_lob(&as), align)) {
error_setg(errp, "the alignment (0x%" PRIx64 ") is not supported",
align);
return 0;
warn_report("the alignment (0x%" PRIx64 ") exceeds the expected"
" maximum alignment, memory will get fragmented and not"
" all 'maxmem' might be usable for memory devices.",
align);
}
memory_device_check_addable(ms, size, &err);
@ -151,7 +152,7 @@ static uint64_t memory_device_get_free_addr(MachineState *ms,
return 0;
}
} else {
if (range_init(&new, range_lob(&as), size)) {
if (range_init(&new, QEMU_ALIGN_UP(range_lob(&as), align), size)) {
error_setg(errp, "can't add memory device, device too big");
return 0;
}