block/backup: hoist bitmap check into QMP interface

This is nicer to do in the unified QMP interface that we have now,
because it lets us use the right terminology back at the user.

Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190716000117.25219-5-jsnow@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
stable-4.2
John Snow 2019-07-29 16:35:55 -04:00
parent 0af2a09c6b
commit a6c9365ad4
2 changed files with 14 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@ -576,6 +576,10 @@ BlockJob *backup_job_create(const char *job_id, BlockDriverState *bs,
assert(bs);
assert(target);
/* QMP interface protects us from these cases */
assert(sync_mode != MIRROR_SYNC_MODE_INCREMENTAL);
assert(sync_bitmap || sync_mode != MIRROR_SYNC_MODE_BITMAP);
if (bs == target) {
error_setg(errp, "Source and target cannot be the same");
return NULL;
@ -607,16 +611,7 @@ BlockJob *backup_job_create(const char *job_id, BlockDriverState *bs,
return NULL;
}
/* QMP interface should have handled translating this to bitmap mode */
assert(sync_mode != MIRROR_SYNC_MODE_INCREMENTAL);
if (sync_mode == MIRROR_SYNC_MODE_BITMAP) {
if (!sync_bitmap) {
error_setg(errp, "must provide a valid bitmap name for "
"'%s' sync mode", MirrorSyncMode_str(sync_mode));
return NULL;
}
/* If we need to write to this bitmap, check that we can: */
if (bitmap_mode != BITMAP_SYNC_MODE_NEVER &&
bdrv_dirty_bitmap_check(sync_bitmap, BDRV_BITMAP_DEFAULT, errp)) {

View File

@ -3529,6 +3529,16 @@ static BlockJob *do_backup_common(BackupCommon *backup,
return NULL;
}
if ((backup->sync == MIRROR_SYNC_MODE_BITMAP) ||
(backup->sync == MIRROR_SYNC_MODE_INCREMENTAL)) {
/* done before desugaring 'incremental' to print the right message */
if (!backup->has_bitmap) {
error_setg(errp, "must provide a valid bitmap name for "
"'%s' sync mode", MirrorSyncMode_str(backup->sync));
return NULL;
}
}
if (backup->sync == MIRROR_SYNC_MODE_INCREMENTAL) {
if (backup->has_bitmap_mode &&
backup->bitmap_mode != BITMAP_SYNC_MODE_ON_SUCCESS) {