qxl: Fix SPICE_RING_PROD_ITEM(), SPICE_RING_CONS_ITEM() sanity check

The pointer arithmetic there is safe, but ugly.  Coverity grouses
about it.  However, the actual comparison is off by one: <= end
instead of < end.  Fix by rewriting the check in a cleaner way.

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Markus Armbruster 2013-01-10 14:24:49 +01:00 committed by Gerd Hoffmann
parent 63fb259083
commit bc5f92e5db

View file

@ -37,33 +37,25 @@
*/
#undef SPICE_RING_PROD_ITEM
#define SPICE_RING_PROD_ITEM(qxl, r, ret) { \
typeof(r) start = r; \
typeof(r) end = r + 1; \
uint32_t prod = (r)->prod & SPICE_RING_INDEX_MASK(r); \
typeof(&(r)->items[prod]) m_item = &(r)->items[prod]; \
if (!((uint8_t*)m_item >= (uint8_t*)(start) && (uint8_t*)(m_item + 1) <= (uint8_t*)(end))) { \
if (prod >= ARRAY_SIZE((r)->items)) { \
qxl_set_guest_bug(qxl, "SPICE_RING_PROD_ITEM indices mismatch " \
"! %p <= %p < %p", (uint8_t *)start, \
(uint8_t *)m_item, (uint8_t *)end); \
"%u >= %zu", prod, ARRAY_SIZE((r)->items)); \
ret = NULL; \
} else { \
ret = &m_item->el; \
ret = &(r)->items[prod].el; \
} \
}
#undef SPICE_RING_CONS_ITEM
#define SPICE_RING_CONS_ITEM(qxl, r, ret) { \
typeof(r) start = r; \
typeof(r) end = r + 1; \
uint32_t cons = (r)->cons & SPICE_RING_INDEX_MASK(r); \
typeof(&(r)->items[cons]) m_item = &(r)->items[cons]; \
if (!((uint8_t*)m_item >= (uint8_t*)(start) && (uint8_t*)(m_item + 1) <= (uint8_t*)(end))) { \
if (cons >= ARRAY_SIZE((r)->items)) { \
qxl_set_guest_bug(qxl, "SPICE_RING_CONS_ITEM indices mismatch " \
"! %p <= %p < %p", (uint8_t *)start, \
(uint8_t *)m_item, (uint8_t *)end); \
"%u >= %zu", cons, ARRAY_SIZE((r)->items)); \
ret = NULL; \
} else { \
ret = &m_item->el; \
ret = &(r)->items[cons].el; \
} \
}