Add missing 'break' to fix:
hw/rtc/twl92230.c: In function ‘menelaus_write’:
hw/rtc/twl92230.c:713:5: error: label at end of compound statement
713 | default:
| ^~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211154605.511714-1-f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When compiling with -Werror=implicit-fallthrough, the compiler complains
about a missing fallthrough annotation in this file. Looking at the code,
the fallthrough is indeed wanted here, so let's add a proper comment.
Message-Id: <20201217154138.1547274-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
The softfloat tests are external repositories, so we do not care
about implicit fallthrough warnings in this code.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-12-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To be able to compile this file with -Werror=implicit-fallthrough,
we need to add some fallthrough annotations to the case statements
that might fall through. Unfortunately, the typical "/* fallthrough */"
comments do not work here as expected since some case labels are
wrapped in macros and the compiler fails to match the comments in
this case. But using __attribute__((fallthrough)) seems to work fine,
so let's use that instead (by introducing a new QEMU_FALLTHROUGH
macro in our compiler.h header file).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-11-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When using -Wimplicit-fallthrough in our CFLAGS, the compiler showed warning:
target/sparc/win_helper.c: In function ‘get_gregset’:
target/sparc/win_helper.c:304:9: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
304 | trace_win_helper_gregset_error(pstate);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
target/sparc/win_helper.c:306:5: note: here
306 | case 0:
| ^~~~
Add the corresponding "fall through" comment to fix it.
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Artyom Tarasenko <atar4qemu@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-10-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When using -Wimplicit-fallthrough in our CFLAGS, the compiler showed warning:
target/sparc/translate.c: In function ‘gen_st_asi’:
target/sparc/translate.c:2320:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
2320 | if (!(dc->def->features & CPU_FEATURE_HYPV)) {
| ^
target/sparc/translate.c:2329:5: note: here
2329 | case GET_ASI_DIRECT:
| ^~~~
The "fall through" statement place is not correctly identified by the compiler.
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Artyom Tarasenko <atar4qemu@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-9-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When using -Wimplicit-fallthrough in our CFLAGS, the compiler showed warning:
../accel/tcg/user-exec.c: In function ‘handle_cpu_signal’:
../accel/tcg/user-exec.c:169:13: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
169 | cpu_exit_tb_from_sighandler(cpu, old_set);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../accel/tcg/user-exec.c:172:9: note: here
172 | default:
Mark the cpu_exit_tb_from_sighandler() function with QEMU_NORETURN to fix it.
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-8-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When using -Wimplicit-fallthrough in our CFLAGS, the compiler showed warning:
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c: In function ‘kvm_arm_gicv3_put’:
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:484:13: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
kvm_gicc_access(s, ICC_AP0R_EL1(1), ncpu, ®64, true);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:485:9: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:495:13: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
kvm_gicc_access(s, ICC_AP1R_EL1(2), ncpu, ®64, true);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:496:9: note: here
case 6:
^~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:498:13: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
kvm_gicc_access(s, ICC_AP1R_EL1(1), ncpu, ®64, true);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:499:9: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c: In function ‘kvm_arm_gicv3_get’:
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:634:37: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
c->icc_apr[GICV3_G0][2] = reg64;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:635:9: note: here
case 6:
^~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:637:37: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
c->icc_apr[GICV3_G0][1] = reg64;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:638:9: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:648:39: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
c->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][2] = reg64;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:649:9: note: here
case 6:
^~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:651:39: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
c->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][1] = reg64;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c:652:9: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-7-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
The current "#ifdef TARGET_X86_64" statement affects
the compiler's determination of fall through.
When using -Wimplicit-fallthrough in our CFLAGS, the compiler showed warning:
target/i386/translate.c: In function ‘gen_shiftd_rm_T1’:
target/i386/translate.c:1773:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if (is_right) {
^
target/i386/translate.c:1782:5: note: here
case MO_32:
^~~~
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-6-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When using -Wimplicit-fallthrough in our CFLAGS, the compiler showed warning:
../hw/timer/renesas_tmr.c: In function ‘tmr_read’:
../hw/timer/renesas_tmr.c:221:19: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
221 | } else if (ch == 0) {i
| ^
../hw/timer/renesas_tmr.c:224:5: note: here
224 | case A_TCORB:
| ^~~~
Add the corresponding "fall through" comment to fix it.
Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Qun <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-5-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
When compiling with -Werror=implicit-fallthrough, gcc complains about
missing fallthrough annotations in this file. Looking at the code,
the fallthrough is indeed wanted here, but instead of adding the
annotations, it can be done more efficiently by simply calculating
the offset with a subtraction instead of increasing a local variable
one by one.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-4-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Looking at the way the code is formatted here (there is an empty line
after break statements, but none where the break is missing), and the
instruction set overview at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicore the
fallthrough is very likely intended here. So add a fallthrough comment
to make the it compilable with -Werror=implicit-fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-3-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
For compiling with -Wimplicit-fallthrough we need to fix the
fallthrough annotations in the libvixl code. This is based on
the following upstream vixl commit by Martyn Capewell:
https://git.linaro.org/arm/vixl.git/commit/?id=de326f850f736c3a337
"GCC 7 enables switch/case fallthrough checking, but this fails in
VIXL, because the annotation we use is Clang specific.
Also, fix a missing annotation in the disassembler."
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201211152426.350966-2-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Instead of using string compares to determine if a RISC-V machine is
using 32-bit or 64-bit CPUs we can use the initalised CPUs. This avoids
us having to maintain a list of CPU names to compare against.
This commit also fixes the name of the function to match the
riscv_cpu_is_32bit() function.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 8ab7614e5df93ab5267788b73dcd75f9f5615e82.1608142916.git.alistair.francis@wdc.com
Currently the riscv_is_32_bit() function only supports the generic rv32
CPUs. Extend the function to support the SiFive and LowRISC CPUs as
well.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Message-id: 9a13764115ba78688ba61b56526c6de65fc3ef42.1608142916.git.alistair.francis@wdc.com
Previously if an interrupt occured during the claim process (after the
interrupt is claimed but before it's completed) it would never be
cleared.
This patch ensures that we also clear the hidden_pending bits as well.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Jackie Ke <jackieke724@hotmail.com>
Message-id: 4e9786084a86f220689123cc8a7837af8fa071cf.1607100423.git.alistair.francis@wdc.com
The TW and TSR fields should be bits 21 and 22 and not 30/29.
This was found while comparing QEMU behaviour against the sail formal
model (https://github.com/rems-project/sail-riscv/).
Signed-off-by: Alex Richardson <Alexander.Richardson@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-id: 20201130170117.71281-1-Alexander.Richardson@cl.cam.ac.uk
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
We found that the hypervisor virtual-machine load and store instructions,
included HLVX/HLV/HSV, couldn't access guest userspace memory.
In the riscv-privileged spec, HLVX/HLV/HSV is defined as follow:
"As usual when V=1, two-stage address translation is applied, and
the HS-level sstatus.SUM is ignored."
But get_physical_address() doesn't ignore sstatus.SUM, when HLVX/HLV/HSV
accesses guest userspace memory. So this patch fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Yifei Jiang <jiangyifei@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yipeng Yin <yinyipeng1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-id: 20201130012810.899-1-jiangyifei@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Fix code style. Don't use '#' flag of printf format ('%#') in
format strings, use '0x' prefix instead
Signed-off-by: Xinhao Zhang <zhangxinhao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Kai Deng <dengkai1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-id: 20201116140148.2850128-1-zhangxinhao1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The sifive_u machine emulates two UARTs but we have only UART0 DT
node in the generated DTB so this patch adds UART1 DT node in the
generated DTB.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-id: 20201111094725.3768755-1-anup.patel@wdc.com
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
linux-user binaries are displayed altogether. Use the '*'
character to force displaying them as bullet list (one list
per architecture).
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Message-Id: <20201119160838.1981709-1-f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Userland ELF binaries using Loongson SIMD instructions have the
HWCAP_LOONGSON_MMI bit set [1].
Binaries compiled for Loongson 3A [2] have the HWCAP_LOONGSON_EXT
bit set for the LQ / SQ instructions.
[1] commit 8e2d5831e4 ("target/mips: Legalize Loongson insn flags")
[2] commit af868995e1 ("target/mips: Add Loongson-3 CPU definition")
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20201214003215.344522-7-f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
ISA features are usually denoted in read-only bits from
CPU registers. Add the GET_FEATURE_REG_EQU() macro which
checks if a CPU register has bits set to a specific value.
Use the macro to check the 'Architecture Revision' level
of the Config0 register, which is '2' when the Release 6
ISA is implemented.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20201214003215.344522-5-f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
ISA features are usually denoted in read-only bits from
CPU registers. Add the GET_FEATURE_REG_SET() macro which
checks if a CPU register has bits set.
Use the macro to check for MSA (which sets the MSAP bit of
the Config3 register when the ASE implementation is present).
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20201214003215.344522-4-f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
We want to add macros similar to GET_FEATURE().
As this one use the 'insn_flags' field, rename it
GET_FEATURE_INSN().
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20201214003215.344522-3-f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
As we are going to add more macros, keep the function body clear.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20201214003215.344522-2-f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
If mremap succeeds, an additional check is performed to ensure that the
new address range fits into the target address space. This check was
previously perfomed in host address space, with the upper bound fixed to
abi_ulong.
This patch replaces the static check with a call to `guest_range_valid`,
performing the range check against the actual size of the target address
space. It also moves the corresponding block to prevent it from being
called incorrectly when the mapping itself fails.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Koch <tobias.koch@nonterra.com>
Message-Id: <20201028213833.26592-1-tobias.koch@nonterra.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
In the previous commits we made cpu_exec_* and debug_excp_handler
optional, so we can now remove these no-op handlers.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201212155530.23098-13-cfontana@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
This will let us simplify the code that initializes CPU class
methods, when we move cpu_exec_*() to a separate struct.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201212155530.23098-11-cfontana@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Move invocation of CPUClass.cpu_exec_*() to separate helpers,
to make it easier to refactor that code later.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201212155530.23098-10-cfontana@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
make it a regular function.
Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201212155530.23098-9-cfontana@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
