In the PAC computation, sbox was applied over wrong bits.
As this is a 4-bit sbox, bit index should be incremented by 4 instead of 16.
Test vector from QARMA paper (https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/444.pdf) was
used to verify one computation of the pauth_computepac() function which
uses sbox2.
Launchpad: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859713
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Vincent DEHORS <vincent.dehors@smile.fr>
Signed-off-by: Adrien GRASSEIN <adrien.grassein@smile.fr>
Message-id: 20200116230809.19078-2-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The ARM pseudocode installs the error_code into the original
pointer, not the encrypted pointer. The difference applies
within the 7 bits of pac data; the result should be the sign
extension of bit 55.
Add a testcase to that effect.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
This allows us to use a single syscall to initialize them all.
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
This is the main crypto routine, an implementation of QARMA.
This matches, as much as possible, ARM pseudocode.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190108223129.5570-28-richard.henderson@linaro.org
[PMM: fixed minor checkpatch nits]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
This is not really functional yet, because the crypto is not yet
implemented. This, however follows the AddPAC pseudo function.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190108223129.5570-27-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
This is not really functional yet, because the crypto is not yet
implemented. This, however follows the Auth pseudo function.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190108223129.5570-26-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Stripping out the authentication data does not require any crypto,
it merely requires the virtual address parameters.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190108223129.5570-25-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The cryptographic internals are stubbed out for now,
but the enable and trap bits are checked.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190108223129.5570-6-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>