Patches in this series are going to make use of "umask" syscall.
So allow it.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210622150852.1507204-5-vgoyal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Follow the inclusive terminology from the "Conscious Language in your
Open Source Projects" guidelines [*] and replace the words "whitelist"
appropriately.
[*] https://github.com/conscious-lang/conscious-lang-docs/blob/main/faq.md
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210205171817.2108907-3-philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
This is how linux restarts some system calls after SIGSTOP/SIGCONT.
This is needed to avoid virtiofsd termination when resuming execution
under GDB for example.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20210201193305.136390-1-groug@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
This is how glibc implements lseek(2) on POWER.
BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917692
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20210121171540.1449777-1-groug@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Clean up includes so that osdep.h is included first and headers
which it implies are not included manually.
This commit was created with scripts/clean-includes, with the changes
to the following files manually reverted:
contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user-glib.h
contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c
contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.h
contrib/plugins/hotblocks.c
contrib/plugins/hotpages.c
contrib/plugins/howvec.c
contrib/plugins/lockstep.c
linux-user/mips64/cpu_loop.c
linux-user/mips64/signal.c
linux-user/sparc64/cpu_loop.c
linux-user/sparc64/signal.c
linux-user/x86_64/cpu_loop.c
linux-user/x86_64/signal.c
target/s390x/gen-features.c
tests/fp/platform.h
tests/migration/s390x/a-b-bios.c
tests/plugin/bb.c
tests/plugin/empty.c
tests/plugin/insn.c
tests/plugin/mem.c
tests/test-rcu-simpleq.c
tests/test-rcu-slist.c
tests/test-rcu-tailq.c
tests/uefi-test-tools/UefiTestToolsPkg/BiosTablesTest/BiosTablesTest.c
contrib/plugins/, tests/plugin/, and tests/test-rcu-slist.c appear not
to include osdep.h intentionally. The remaining reverts are the same
as in commit bbfff19688.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201113061216.2483385-1-armbru@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
Using st_dev is not sufficient to uniquely identify a mount: You can
mount the same device twice, but those are still separate trees, and
e.g. by mounting something else inside one of them, they may differ.
Using statx(), we can get a mount ID that uniquely identifies a mount.
If that is available, add it to the lo_inode key.
Most of this patch is taken from Miklos's mail here:
https://marc.info/?l=fuse-devel&m=160062521827983
(virtiofsd-use-mount-id.patch attachment)
Suggested-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201102161859.156603-5-mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
On ppc, and some other archs, it looks like syslog ends up using 'send'
rather than 'sendto'.
Reference: https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/issues/1050
Reported-by: amulmek1@in.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201102150750.34565-1-dgilbert@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
glib offers thread pools and it seems to support "exclusive" and "shared"
thread pools.
https://developer.gnome.org/glib/stable/glib-Thread-Pools.html#g-thread-pool-new
Currently we use "exlusive" thread pools but its performance seems to be
poor. I tried using "shared" thread pools and performance seems much
better. I posted performance results here.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/virtio-fs/2020-September/msg00080.html
So lets switch to shared thread pools. We can think of making it optional
once somebody can show in what cases exclusive thread pools offer better
results. For now, my simple performance tests across the board see
better results with shared thread pools.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200921213216.GE13362@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
With seccomp fix from Miklos
