Each of qdev-monitor-test and blockdev-test has just one test case,
and both are about drive_del.
[Extended copyright from 2013 to 2013-2014 as requested by Eric Blake.
--Stefan]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-id: 1412261496-24455-2-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Test the error class instead. Expecting a specific message is
fragile. In fact, it broke once already, in commit 75884af. Restore
the test of error member "class" dropped there, and drop the test of
error member "desc".
There are no other tests of "desc" as far as I can tell.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Use g_assert_cmpstr() instead of combining g_assert() and strcmp(3).
This simplifies the code since we no longer have to play games to
distinguish NULL from "" using "(null)".
gcc extension haters will also be happy that ?: was dropped.
Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Ensure that the device_add error code path deletes device objects.
Failure to do so not only leaks the objects but can also keep other
objects (like drive or netdev) alive due to qdev properties holding
references.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
