The handling of the FPU state in sparc64_get_context() and
sparc64_set_context() is not the same as what the kernel actually
does: we unconditionally read and write the FP registers and the
FSR, GSR and FPRS, but the kernel logic is more complicated:
* in get_context the kernel has code for saving FPU registers,
but it is hidden inside an "if (fenab) condition and the
fenab flag is always set to 0 (inside an "#if 1" which has
been in the kernel for over 15 years). So the effect is that
the FPU state part is always written as zeroes.
* in set_context the kernel looks at the fenab field in the
structure from the guest, and only restores the state if
it is set; it also looks at the structure's FPRS to see
whether either the upper or lower or both halves of the
register file have valid data.
Bring our implementations into line with the kernel:
* in get_context:
- clear the entire target_ucontext at the top of the
function (as the kernel does)
- then don't write the FPU state, so those fields remain zero
- this fixes Coverity issue CID 1432305 by deleting the code
it was complaining about
* in set_context:
- check the fenab and the fpsr to decide which parts of
the FPU data to restore, if any
- instead of setting the FPU registers by doing two
32-bit loads and filling in the .upper and .lower parts
of the CPU_Double union separately, just do a 64-bit
load of the whole register at once. This fixes Coverity
issue CID 1432303 because we now access the dregs[] part
of the mcfpu_fregs union rather than the sregs[] part
(which is not large enough to actually cover the whole of
the data, so we were accessing off the end of sregs[])
We change both functions in a single commit to avoid potentially
breaking bisection.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20201106152738.26026-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
[lv: fix FPRS_DU loop s/31/32/]
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
246ff44295