Assume clzw being executed on a register that is not sign-extended, such
as for the following sequence that uses (1ULL << 63) | 392 as the operand
to clzw:
bseti a2, zero, 63
addi a2, a2, 392
clzw a3, a2
The correct result of clzw would be 23, but the current implementation
returns -32 (as it performs a 64bit clz, which results in 0 leading zero
bits, and then subtracts 32).
Fix this by changing the implementation to:
1. shift the original register up by 32
2. performs a target-length (64bit) clz
3. return 32 if no bits are set
Marking this instruction as 'w-form' (i.e., setting ctx->w) would not
correctly model the behaviour, as the instruction should not perform
a zero-extensions on the input (after all, it is not a .uw instruction)
and the result is always in the range 0..32 (so neither a sign-extension
nor a zero-extension on the result will ever be needed). Consequently,
we do not set ctx->w and mark the instruction as EXT_NONE.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>
Reviewed-by: LIU Zhiwei<zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com>
Message-id: 20210911140016.834071-4-philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
45d1749c1c